Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Calvin M. Redshaw's avatar

Well said. I wrote something similar and the opening lines are exactly what you're talking about here: "England is often described as one of the most centralised countries in the developed world. The phrase is familiar. What is less often explored is what the opposite would actually look like — not in abstract terms, but in daily life, economic decision-making, and democratic accountability." My conclusion is a country where local authorities and cities govern — rather than administer — would be more dynamic, more accountable, and more resilient. Growth would be shaped by places, not just policies. Democracy would be rooted closer to daily life.

No posts

Ready for more?